Black caucus questions Bishop Bledsoe evaluation

The situation involving Bishop W. Earl Bledsoe, an African-American who says he is being pushed to retire, is “a source of significant anguish and disappointment,” says The United Methodist Church’s African-American caucus.

Black Methodists for Church Renewal Inc., which represents African-American United Methodists and congregations across the United States, announced its concerns Friday, June 15, in an open letter to the United Methodist Judicial Council, the Council of Bishops, the South Central Jurisdiction and North Texas Annual (regional) Conference episcopacy review committees. Bishop Bledsoe, 61 and in his fourth year as bishop, oversees the North Texas Conference that encompasses the Dallas metroplex and parts of east Texas. 

“Our greatest concern regarding the issues related to Bishop Bledsoe is the process of evaluating bishops of the church; particularly the process that has taken place in the South Central Jurisdiction,” said the letter signed by the Rev. Ronnie Miller-Yow, the group’s chair. “We would like to know what rubric is used to measure the benchmarks of effectiveness.”

Mr. Miller-Yow also serves in the South Central Jurisdiction as the senior pastor of Wesley Chapel United Methodist Church and chaplain at United Methodist-related Philander Smith College in Little Rock, Ark. He also will be a delegate to the South Central Jurisdictional Conference on July 17-21 in Oklahoma City. Jurisdictional conferences have the responsibility of electing bishops.

The letter noted that that the North Texas Conference has reported increases in worship attendance, increased giving to apportionments that support general church operations, and 16 new church starts under Bledsoe’s watch. 

“What other measurements are being used?” the letter asked. 

Black Methodist for Church Renewal’s statement echoed concerns raised in a June 13 letter by the United Methodist Commission on Religion and Race that clergy at all levels of the church receive evaluations under “rigorous, consistent and commonly understood policies and processes.”

The United Methodist News Service asked representatives of the five United Methodist jurisdictional episcopacy committees, which evaluate and assign U.S. bishops, to share what metrics they use in assessing bishops. Don House, the South Central Jurisdiction’s committee chair, was the first to respond with three documents — the bishop’s questionnaire and two episcopal area questionnaires, Part  A and Part B.

Also on June 15, Mr. House announced that the committee was postponing its hearing for Bledsoe, originally scheduled on July 10 in Dallas, to July 16 in Oklahoma City.

The letter from Black Methodists for Church Renewal is the latest turn in a public dispute between a bishop and a jurisdictional episcopacy committee that many longtime church observers call unprecedented in the denomination’s 44-year history. 

Bishop Bledsoe initially announced plans to retire in a video on June 1. But days later on June 5, the bishop stunned many at the North Texas annual gathering when he declared that he was being forced out and would not stand for it. He said he made his decision after prayer and seeing the conference’s positive statistical data, which included a second consecutive year of increased worship attendance. 

Episcopacy committee releases statement

Late on June 8, Mr. House released a statement explaining why the episcopacy panel asked Bledsoe to retire early.

“While having some skills as a spiritual leader, his administrative skills, relational skills, and style remain in question,” said the statement from Mr. House.

Mr. House also announced on June 15 that the South Central Jurisdiction episcopacy committee’s hearing for Bledsoe, originally set for July 10, has been delayed to July 16 in Oklahoma City.

“Our committee needs more time to prepare for the hearing,” Mr. House said. 

Under the Book of Discipline, the denomination’s law book, jurisdictional and central conference episcopacy committees can place a bishop in involuntary retirement by a two-thirds vote. Just as jurisdictional committees assign and evaluate U.S. bishops, the central conference bodies do the same with bishops in Africa, Asia and Europe. Each jurisdictional committee on the episcopacy includes a clergy delegate and a lay delegate from each of that jurisdiction’s conferences.

The Book of Discipline says a bishop can appeal a vote for involuntary retirement to the United Methodist Judicial Council, the denomination’s top court. 

 

 

Leave a Reply

1 Comment on "Black caucus questions Bishop Bledsoe evaluation"

applications-education-miscellaneous.png
The United Methodist Reporter wants to encourage lively conversation about The United Methodist Church and our articles in the belief that Christian conversation (what Wesley would call conferencing) is a means of grace. While we support passionate debate, we cannot allow language that demeans or demonizes others, and we reserve the right to delete any comment we believe to be harmful or inappropriate. We encourage all to remember that we are all broken and in need of Christ's grace, and that we all see through the glass darkly until that time we when reach full perfection in love. May your speech here be tempered with love, and reflection of the fruits of love, joy, peace, patience, kindness, goodness, faithfulness, gentleness, and self-control. After all, "There is no law against things like this." (Galatians 5:22-23)
 
Notify of
avatar
Sort by:   newest | oldest | most voted
stewie
Guest

This should prove challenging. The church has seen incompetency from its bishops in the past but until now has never elected to remove one. Some want to say it's racial, but it involves more than that. Is Bishop Bledsoe being used as a scapegoat for the alleged inappropriate actions of a former minister?

wpDiscuz
Google+
%d bloggers like this: