Jurisdiction opposes UMC on homosexuality

The Western Jurisdiction of the United Methodist Church has issued a “Statement of Gospel Obedience” that emphasizes Christ’s grace and love is available to all and that the UMC is in error on the subject of “homosexuality’s incompatibility with Christian teaching.”

In addition, delegates to the jurisdictional meeting July 18-21 voted to extend “extravagant hospitality” to all people including “Gay, Lesbian, Bisexual, Transgender, Queer, or Intersex and those whose gender expression is ambiguous.”

Retired Bishop Melvin Talbert was asked to oversee a Western Jurisdiction grassroots movement that challenges bishops, clergy, laity and local churches and ministry settings to operate as if the statement printed in the denomination’s law book—Paragraph 161F—“does not exist.”

Retired UM Bishop Melvin Talbert speaks to the Western Jurisdictional Conference of the UMC during its July 18-21 meeting in San Diego, Calif. UMNS PHOTO COURTESY OF THE PACIFIC NORTHWEST CONFERENCE COMMUNICATIONS TEAM

Bishop Talbert said he has publicly stated many times that if asked to perform a same-sex marriage he will do so. He also said the active bishops of the Western Jurisdiction “will be bishops of the church” and uphold church law.

Bishop Minerva Carcaño, president of the Western Jurisdiction College of Bishops, said the bishops “are of one mind” during her address to the jurisdiction.

“We believe that our beloved United Methodist Church has been less than faithful to the biblical mandate to accept all God’s children including our LGBTQ(IA) brothers and sisters. We assume responsibility for preaching and teaching in every place we serve, this good news of Christ Jesus who welcomes all,” she said.

Bishop Rosemarie Wenner, president of the Council of Bishops, noted that she does not want to comment on decisions of conferences. “I trust in the process of holy conferencing, and I trust that my colleague bishops will act according to their call to serve the church as bishops of the church in the task of oversight for the general church and for the areas they are assigned to,” she said.

The council does not have supervisory authority over the bishops.

The five jurisdictions in the United States met in their regions July 18-21. Jurisdictions meet once every four years to elect bishops and conduct business.

During the worldwide 2012 General Conference April 24-May 4, the church voted to retain current language in its law book that declares “homosexuality is incompatible with Christian teaching.” Other sections of the law book state “self-avowed practicing homosexuals” may not be ordained as clergy and that United Methodist clergy cannot perform same-sex marriage ceremonies and same-sex wedding ceremonies may not be in United Methodist churches.

“We pledge to you that we will continue to work for that day when we, the United Methodist Church, can truly live up to our logo of open hearts, open minds, open doors,” Bishop Carcaño said.

Bishop Minerva Carcaño gives the Episcopal Address at the 2012 Western Jurisdictional Conference. UMNS PHOTO COURTESY OF THE PACIFIC NORTHWEST CONFERENCE COMMUNICATIONS TEAM

The UMC’s Western Jurisdiction encompasses the eight westernmost regional conferences of the United States, including Alaska, Arizona, California, Colorado, Hawaii, Idaho, Montana, Nevada, Oregon, Utah, Washington, Wyoming, Guam, and other territory in the Pacific.

In other action, the Western Jurisdiction apologized for the actions of the 2012 General Conference and said it plans to write letters to the editors of major newspapers in each conference of the jurisdiction, informing them of the apology.

The jurisdiction also suggested the penalty of a suspension for 24 consecutive hours from the exercise of episcopal office for any bishop charged, tried and convicted of ordaining or appointing a “self-avowed practicing homosexual.” The jurisdiction can only suggest a penalty; the trial court sets the penalty.

The action means the jurisdiction “can no longer passively live with the hypocritical oxymoron of a denomination that declares that ‘God loves all’ while it excludes some people from acceptance and leadership based on sexual orientation,” said Greg Nelson, director of communications of the Oregon-Idaho Conference.

The action is an effort “to change the conversation” and move forward, he said.

“The Western Jurisdiction embraces the denominational brand promise of ‘Open Hearts, Open Minds, and Open Doors’ and is working to make it a reality.”

NE Jurisdiction resolution

The Northeastern Jurisdiction also affirmed its commitment to the rights of all persons at its 2012 meeting. In a resolution, the jurisdiction stated, “Clergy, lay persons and congregations may feel bound by conscience to offer the ministries and sacraments of the church to all persons on an equal basis and that even though bound to the Book of Discipline, we are also bound by Jesus’ commandment to stand with the marginalized and the oppressed in our midst.”

The resolution was approved by 61 percent.

A statement by the Northeastern Jurisdiction Evangelical Connection of United Methodists expressed disappointment in the vote.

“This statement stands in opposition to the doctrine and discipline of The United Methodist Church. A jurisdictional conference does not have the authority to speak in a manner contrary to the General Conference of the denomination. Therefore, we do not believe this statement can be implemented or enforced in any way,” the statement said.

The group also pointed out that the position of the United Methodist Church on human sexuality has not changed.

The Northeastern Jurisdiction includes the states of Connecticut, Delaware, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Vermont, West Virginia and the District of Columbia.

 

 

Leave a Reply

5 Comments on "Jurisdiction opposes UMC on homosexuality"

applications-education-miscellaneous.png
The United Methodist Reporter wants to encourage lively conversation about The United Methodist Church and our articles in the belief that Christian conversation (what Wesley would call conferencing) is a means of grace. While we support passionate debate, we cannot allow language that demeans or demonizes others, and we reserve the right to delete any comment we believe to be harmful or inappropriate. We encourage all to remember that we are all broken and in need of Christ's grace, and that we all see through the glass darkly until that time we when reach full perfection in love. May your speech here be tempered with love, and reflection of the fruits of love, joy, peace, patience, kindness, goodness, faithfulness, gentleness, and self-control. After all, "There is no law against things like this." (Galatians 5:22-23)
 
Notify of
avatar
Sort by:   newest | oldest | most voted
servant
Guest

I am a member of a UMC. I have trouble understanding how a group of professing Christians can turn away from the bible. That being said, would you please tell me what page or pages you intend to remove from the Bible so that your beliefs will support your social issues. And, please tell me, since you have set limits on your faith, where does it start and where does it end. I believe the scripture tells us that, paraphrasing, the traditions man have made the Gospel of God of none effect.

robert leverenz
Guest

I find it disconcerting that in all this conversation we coontinue to ignore biblical scholarship and current understanding of human sexuality, its genetic base,,, ignorance and fear continue to prevail. I can understand some laity may not be students of biblical scholarship but there is no excuse for a united Methodist Clergy to ignore scholarship and scientific understanding of sexuality … I am profoundly pleased with the WJC resolutiion. I have performed same sex marriages and will continue to do so.
Bob Leverenz, United Methodist Pastor.

jpinsatx
Guest

Hmmm… "The derogatory language and restrictive laws in the Book of Discipline are immoral and unjust and no longer deserve our loyalty and obedience." Personally, I stand with Jesus, John Wesley and Bishop Talbert. The Old Testament references to homosexuality pertain to the establishment and preservation of the Hebrew nation. The New Testament references are questionable and disputed pertaining to specific situations, primarily temple prostitution. Jesus never condemned same-sex relationships. As for the role of the church, it seems we have a difference of opinion: Regulate vs Nurture… Calvin vs Wesley!

John
Guest
These statements exemplify how seriously astray one can drift from God when one chooses to ignore the clear teaching of His Word. Did Jesus not instruct the adulterous woman to "sin no more"? He did not declare her behavior to have been permissible; He quite clearly passed judgment on it as having been sinful! Homosexual behavior is clearly declared to be sin in the Bible because it violates God's created design and it pretty obviously is hurtful to the parents of the one who chooses to practice such behavior and who thereby rejects their parents' heterosexual example. But it is… Read more »
kimberly
Guest
To me, it comes down to Jesus' speech about casting the first stone. I wear clothes that have combinations of fabrics. I have celebrated when my friends have married people of other faiths. I eat shrimp and other shellfish. If I am not obeying every single tenet listed in the Bible, then I have no right to judge anyone who is doing something that hurts no one. No one can honestly say that he or she obeys every rule in the Bible. If there is judgment to be made, I say we trust God to make it.
wpDiscuz
Google+
%d bloggers like this: