Yes, bishop’s forced retirement is a race issue

By Henry L. Masters Sr., Special Contributor…

I am an ashamed United Methodist! The action of the South Central Jurisdiction (SCJ) to force Bishop W. Earl Bledsoe into retirement was a sad and shameful day for me. I am a lifelong United Methodist with four decades of pastoral ministry. The unprecedented action of the 2012 SCJ was a painful reality that race is still an unresolved matter in the United Methodist Church.

Bishop Bledsoe said before the SCJ that he saw unfairness in the evaluation of him and in the effort to remove him, but did not see a race issue. Whether, having endured involuntary retirement at SCJ, he still feels that way is a good question. But many of us have from the outset wondered whether race is a factor, and what happened at SCJ gave me a clear answer—“yes.”

The SCJ is by its own admission (see Bishop Robert Schnase’s episcopal address) 90 percent white, while the population of the same geographic area is only 58 percent white. The vote against Bishop Bledsoe was 82 percent! My experience would not allow me to exempt racial overtones in that vote.

It is also common knowledge that in SCJ history there have been several (white) bishops with very marginal administrative skills whose tenure resulted in low morale and threats of complaints but for whom the SCJ Episcopacy Committee always found an assignment. And by objective measures, such as worship attendance, apportionment payments and church starts, the North Texas Conference under Bishop Bledsoe is one of relatively few U.S. conferences to have seen positive results.

Under the guise of “increasing accountability” lurks a “plantation politics” riddled with paternalism, white male chauvinistic elitism and protectionism. The minds of SCJ members seemed made up regardless of what was presented. The SCJ Episcopacy Committee Chair led the delegates through a litany of self-serving innuendos and “possible charges and complaints.” I was so offended by his implication that they were doing this for the Bishop’s own good. Black people know all too well how it feels to have overseers say “we know what is good for you.”

There is meanness afoot in America and the United Methodist Church. The church should be helping to address it—not be a part of it.

While the UMC’s slogan is “making disciples of Jesus Christ for the transformation of the world,” the denomination is getting whiter and whiter in the face of a U.S. population that’s rapidly becoming more ethnically diverse. And the SCJ Episcopacy Committee seeks to make our leadership even whiter with the forced retirement of Bishop Bledsoe. Should this be the posture of a denomination in decline in the U.S.?

Our church is being hijacked by power seeking, power hungry, vindictive committees and voting blocs. People are being valued by their ability to get elected or to help others get elected to something. Practically every leader is “running for something.” Voices are often silenced by fear of these “power leaders.” I’m not claiming nobility, but I’m not interested in running for anything or from anybody. God did not give us a spirit of fear (II Timothy 1:7). We must continue to speak truth to power and speak for those who cannot speak for themselves.

The church has been and is at its best when we are focused on making disciples of Jesus Christ among all people and when we stop playing politics with the Lord’s church. It should also be a sobering reminder to all UMC clergy and bishops that the action taken against Bishop Bledsoe could show up at your doorstep next—by those claiming “greater accountability.” Bishop Bledsoe now must consider getting justice where, historically, black people have always resorted—the courts!

One more black man has been made “homeless.” This action has turned back the clock on race relations farther than any of us ever imagined it could go. It will take a long time to get past this hurt—if we ever do. The work so many have done—including Kathleen Baskin-Ball, Bill Crouch, John Miles, Mai Gray, Dr. Bill Farmer and others—seems perilously on the edge of falling away. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.’s question “Where do we go from here?” is hauntingly invading our time and place.

There are many wounded souls in the SCJ and they are not all black. Some are calling for healing, but serious and vigorous dialogue is desperately needed first, to put us on a path toward healing. That healing must be rooted in II Chronicles 7:14.

The Rev. Dr. Masters is senior pastor of St. Luke “Community” UMC in Dallas.

Join the conversation....

  1. Dr. Masters, your courage is a blessing. I pray continued strength for you and for Bishop Bledsoe, and healing for the SCJ and the UMC.

  2. methodistpie says:

    Plantation politics. One more black man made "homeless." White male chauvinistic elitism. Perhaps the contributor is expressing loyalty to the bishop who has appointed him to a mega-church. But if this in any way, shape or form represents Bishop Bledsoe's own attitude, it helps me understand why the Jurisdictional Conference voted for his removal. A white pastor using this kind of inflamatory language regarding minority persons would, quite properly, be brought up on charges.

    • I'm so sick and tired of people playing the race card. Almost every time there is an accusation made against a minority, the first thing that hits the headlines is "racism." If he has had his day in court and been found unworthy to continue as a bishop; stand up and take it like a man and stop playing politics.

      The real shame is that Sunday morning is STILL the most segregated few hours of the week. We don't seem to be able to fellowship together when there isn't a crisis; God help us when there is.

      Most of the people I talk to who no longer go to church say it's because they don't see any difference between people who do and people who don't! Now, there is an indictment for you. And we wring our hands and wonder why the Methodist church lost almost 72,000 members last year. Duh!

  3. border_ruffian says:

    Who is being racist here? Dr. Masters, as methodistpie notes above, certainly seems to resort to the perjorative here in regards to his non-African American colleagues. I am also concerned that he does not supply a complete argument regarding the voting. He notes, "The SCJ is by its own admission (see Bishop Robert Schnase’s episcopal address) 90 percent white, while the population of the same geographic area is only 58 percent white. The vote against Bishop Bledsoe was 82 percent! My experience would not allow me to exempt racial overtones in that vote." With only his "experience" cited as an evidenciary source, Dr. Masters infers that the 82 percent vote against Bledsoe was all white. But do we know how the vote went in regards to race/ethnicity? The implication is a double one here, and has equal amounts of racism implied – Master's implication seems to be that, of course, ALL the votes against Bledsoe were white, while ALL the votes in Bledsoe's favor were African American. If that were the case, wouldn't it also be racist for ALL the African Americans to vote in favor of Bledsoe?

    How is it that Bledsoe can state repeatedly that this was not a racial issue, but Masters is convinced otherwise? Is Masters on the SCJ Episcopacy Committee and has first hand knowledge of this blatant racism?

  4. garyleeparker1952 says:

    As a white man who grew up in Waverly, NY, I find this article right on. You see, I was born into a nominal Methodist family and raise in a Methodist daughter-Global Church of the Nazarene. I believe more and more that when we have Acts of Repentance worship services, the acts of repentance must continue in our daily life even in our decisions. I pray that the UMC courts will see the racism that existed in the forced early retirement of Bishop Bledsoe and reinstate him as an active Bishop for at least four more years. May the UMC and the CN begin to address their covert racist attitudes however they may show up. I am proud to be a United Methodist again, but as Reverend Masters I am ashamed of the racist actions that continue to exist. Just maybe, if we began to be inclusive with people with impairments an their families this could be a healing time to be inclusive with all people.

  5. sunshine1 says:

    Dr. Master's contribution has placed a clear spotlight on the wrongs being done by a few in power in this conference. It is indeed a sad day to see one who has worked hard to do the will of God be tormented by those who he has considered his brothers and sisters in ministry. I agree this Bishop has accomplished much and he has had to learn much, but overall he has done an exceptional work in this conference (this is documented fact). It is a known fact that there have been major issues in the past with other Bishops/leaders in this conference and region who have not received such a stoning or a beating. So many have asked the question "Why is this Bishop receiving such a harsh punishment"? We still have not received a clear anwser nor any response with merit. Clearly we are witnessing the acts of poor leadership, carelessness, and selfishness in this conference by those in power. Yes, a sad day indeed! Much prayer will be required to heal a hurting people and for those who have caused much turmoil and division in God's church.

  6. My Motp is "If the Church is in this world to save it, we better learn HOW to save ourselves", just think about that for a moment. In this coming election, it sure seems we have forgot who and what we are.

  7. I am just as discouraged by this article as I am by the treatment of Bishop Bledsoe. The Author's only proof of racism seems to be that he is sure that must be what it is. The measured statistics never really tell about the skills of Bishop Bledsoe. I realize that confidentiality precludes sharing all the details of the concerns with Bishop Bledsoe's Ministry. But I find the whole process suspect for several reasons: Bishop Bledsoe obviously has a record of fruitful above average ministry prior to his election to the episcopacy. Otherwise, the jurisdiction never would have elected him. It is hard to imagine he suddenly became totally incompetent. The manner in which Bishops are evaluated in this new model is of note. I don't know that those making the evaluation have a thorough knowledge of the actual skills of the Bishop. If that conference is at all like ours, he may be judged on whether or not he met the expectations of the Conference leaders; who judges the expectations of the conference leaders? Finally, the retirement or nothing choice bothers me. As an Elder in Full-connection in the UMC, should he not be offered an appointment in his home Conference? And I too wonder- Why this particular Bishop? Surely others have not been hugely successful before this!

Your thoughts?

applications-education-miscellaneous.png
The United Methodist Reporter wants to encourage lively conversation about The United Methodist Church and our articles in the belief that Christian conversation (what Wesley would call conferencing) is a means of grace. While we support passionate debate, we cannot allow language that demeans or demonizes others, and we reserve the right to delete any comment we believe to be harmful or inappropriate. We encourage all to remember that we are all broken and in need of Christ's grace, and that we all see through the glass darkly until that time we when reach full perfection in love. May your speech here be tempered with love, and reflection of the fruits of love, joy, peace, patience, kindness, goodness, faithfulness, gentleness, and self-control. After all, "There is no law against things like this." (Galatians 5:22-23)
 

*

Google+
%d bloggers like this: