Religious labels matter less in 2012 campaign

By Bob Smietana, USA Today…

There aren’t any white Protestants on the presidential ballot this year—a first in American history.

Instead, the race features two Catholic candidates for vice president, and a Mormon Republican and African-American mainline Protestant for president.

Perhaps lucky for all of them, voters care more about issues such as social justice or gay marriage than they do about denominational brands.

That’s particularly true for Republican Mitt Romney and running mate Paul Ryan, who hope to woo evangelical voters that share their values rather than their theology.

It’s a situation that probably would have baffled famous evangelicals such as the late Rev. Jerry Falwell, who used the issue of abortion in the 1970s and 1980s to turn evangelicals into a powerhouse voting bloc among Republicans.

“If you had told Jerry Falwell back in 1980 that by 2012 that there would not be a white Protestant on the ticket—he would have died right there,” said Shaun Casey, professor of Christian ethics at UM-affiliated Wesley Theological Seminary in Washington.

Former Mass. Gov. Mitt Romney

But the same dynamic doesn’t bother David French of Columbia, Tenn., a blogger at He wants a candidate who shares his values, not his theology.

“The real questions are: Is this person pro-life? Are they pro-marriage? Is this person really conservative?” Mr. French said.

The answer to all three of those questions is yes for Mr. Romney, he said, and that’s more important than the fact that some evangelicals see Mr. Romney’s Mormon beliefs as heretical.

He also said that Americans in general no longer worry about denominational labels. Mr. French, for example, grew up attending a Church of Christ and now attends a conservative Presbyterian church. A Pew Forum study in 2008 found that 44 percent of Americans have changed faiths at least once.

“We are moving well past being obsessed with religious affiliation or denominational labels,” he said.

Dr. Casey, however, said having a Mormon and Catholic on the ticket could be risky for Republicans because both groups have been seen as suspect in the past by evangelicals.

Dr. Casey, who worked on religious outreach for President Obama’s 2008 campaign, said the prospect of voting for a Mormon candidate may keep some evangelicals at home.

President Obamar President Obama’s 2008 campaign, said the prospect of voting for a Mormon candidate may keep some evangelicals at home.

“I am not looking for a record evangelical turnout this time,” said Dr. Casey, who wrote a book about the anti-Catholicism in 1960 that nearly kept John F. Kennedy out of the White House.

According to CNN exit polls in 2008, about three-quarters of evangelicals voted for Arizona Sen. John McCain, the Republican nominee for president. During the election, Mr. McCain touted the fact that he attended a Baptist church.

A quarter voted for Mr. Obama, who joined a United Church of Christ in his 20s. Among the evangelicals who voted for Mr. Obama was John Lamb, a Southern Baptist from Nashville, Tenn. He plans to support Mr. Obama again. His main concern is immigration reform.

“I am dismayed at the lack of concern for the poor and for disenfranchised immigrants in this country,” he said.

Mr. Lamb doubts that denominational labels make much difference to voters. He points out that former presidents Jimmy Carter and Bill Clinton were Southern Baptists, and evangelicals opposed them both.

But it’s not just the voters who downplay denominational identity.

A recent study of voting patterns in Congress found that legislators follow ideology and party affiliation, no matter what their religion.

Bill D’Antonio, a senior fellow at the Institute for Policy Research and Catholic Studies at the Catholic University of America, looked at roll call votes on abortion from 1977 to 2010.

Before 1980, the votes followed denominational lines. Mainline Protestants from both parties voted for abortion rights. More than half of Catholics from both parties voted against, according to the study.

After 1980, the pattern changed. Most Democrats became supportive of abortion rights, and most Republicans became anti-abortion.

“Party now trumps religion,” Dr. D’Antonio said.

In recent years, Democrats have tried to woo evangelical voters on the issue of social justice. That makes sense to Marcia Pally, author of The New Evangelicals: Expanding the Vision of the Common Good (Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Company, 2011).

“When the ordinary person in the pew starts working in a prison ministry program or food pantry, or goes to Haiti or Uganda and works to prevent malaria or build houses—their priorities change,” she said.

Still, Democrats’ appeals to evangelicals have largely failed—abortion is a big reason, Ms. Pally said—and polls show that a growing number of evangelicals support Mr. Romney.

Robert Jones, president of the Washington-based Public Religion Research Institute, said evangelicals were skeptical about Mr. Romney at first. In October 2010, about 40 percent of evangelicals had a favorable view of the Republican candidate.

Once it became clear that Mr. Romney was Mr. Obama’s opponent, that figure shot up to 68 percent, said Dr. Jones.

Mr. Smietana writes for USA Today and The (Nashville) Tennessean. This story was distributed by Religion News Service.

Special Contributor to UMR

Special Contributor

This story was written by a special contributor to The United Methodist Reporter. You may send your article submissions to

Leave a Reply

The United Methodist Reporter wants to encourage lively conversation about The United Methodist Church and our articles in the belief that Christian conversation (what Wesley would call conferencing) is a means of grace. While we support passionate debate, we cannot allow language that demeans or demonizes others, and we reserve the right to delete any comment we believe to be harmful or inappropriate. We encourage all to remember that we are all broken and in need of Christ's grace, and that we all see through the glass darkly until that time we when reach full perfection in love. May your speech here be tempered with love, and reflection of the fruits of love, joy, peace, patience, kindness, goodness, faithfulness, gentleness, and self-control. After all, "There is no law against things like this." (Galatians 5:22-23)
Notify of
%d bloggers like this: