Bishop Bledsoe to be reassigned – but how?

No doubt about it: the UMC’s Judicial Council has overturned Bishop Earl Bledsoe’s involuntary retirement and said he must immediately be given an episcopal area to oversee. But how is that assignment to be made?

Bishop Earl Bledsoe

Head scratching could almost be heard around the South Central Jurisdiction.

“The circumstances before us are new ground,” said Bishop Janice Huie, president of the South Central Jurisdiction College of Bishops, in a brief, carefully worded statement.

The decision to retire Bishop Bledsoe involuntarily was made in July by the South Central Jurisdiction episcopacy committee, which concluded he had been ineffective in his four years as leader of the North Texas Conference and was unsuited to lead any conference in the jurisdiction.

By an overwhelming margin, delegates to the South Central Jurisdictional Conference affirmed the committee’s work.

Bishop Bledsoe appealed to the Judicial Council and, after a three-hour hearing on Friday, won. The council reinstated him, gave him back pay and ordered that he be given an episcopal area.

But just as the decision to retire a bishop involuntarily was unprecedented, so, apparently, is the task of assigning a reinstated bishop.

And there’s pressure to get it right, not least because the Judicial Council found “numerous errors” violating fair process in how the episcopacy committee handled the involuntary retirement decision. Errors, real or perceived, could land the whole matter back before Judicial Council, should someone choose to challenge how things play out.

Bishop Huie referred in her statement to the part of the Book of Discipline that deals with assigning of bishops. It notes that the jurisdictional episcopacy committee gets to recommend “for final action by the jurisdictional conference” where bishops are assigned.

So the same episcopacy committee that voted to retire Bishop Bledsoe presumably would convene and recommend where to assign him. And, again presumably, a special meeting of the jurisdictional conference would have to be called for delegates from the conference to approve that recommendation.

The Rev. David Severe, director of mission and administration of the South Central Jurisdiction, said a one-day special meeting of delegates from around the jurisdiction would probably cost $150,000 to $175,000. Some have suggested the meeting might be held via Skype, or that voting could occur online; but Dr. Severe said there’s no provision in the rules governing jurisdictional conferences for that to happen.

Who would call the meeting, set the date and determine the location? That too is an issue.

Dr. Severe said he expects the College of Bishops will be giving direction. But he noted that another group called the Jurisdictional Mission Council is responsible for governing decisions between jurisdictional conferences.

The Rev. Jim Welch of Kingwood UMC in Kingwood, Tex., leads that council, and also serves on the jurisdictional episcopacy committee.  Asked to sum up the situation, he sounded a lot like Bishop Huie.

“We’re plowing new ground here,” he said.

Mr. Welch said he planned to be in touch with Dr. Severe, and would also be looking for some word from the College of Bishops. But he also said he considers Dallas, with its two airports and multitude of flights, and Lovers Lane UMC – near Love Field airport in Dallas – as one candidate for a location for the meeting.

The one episcopal area vacancy in the South Central Jurisdiction consists of the Northwest Texas and New Mexico conferences, with the episcopal residence in Albuquerque. That episcopal area currently is being overseen by two retired bishops.

But while that would seem the likely place to assign Bishop Bledsoe, Dr. Severe said it will need to be decided whether the episcopacy committee can recommend that without revisiting all the assignments – in other words, going back to square one with the assignment process that occurred in July.

Bishop Bledsoe said Sunday that he and his wife, Leslie, “have always gone where the church wanted us to go. We do truly trust God, whatever that decision is.”

The Rev. Jimmy Nunn is director of mission and administration for the Northwest Texas Conference, and he said he believes the churches there want to cooperate with the process, however it plays out.

“We’re going to welcome whoever is assigned,” he said.

Bishop Huie concluded her brief statement by saying, “All of us in the College of Bishops remain in prayer for Bishop Bledsoe and Leslie, the Jurisdictional Committee on Episcopacy and the South Central Jurisdictional Conference.”

 

 

Sam Hodges, Former Managing Editor, UMR

Sam Hodges

Sam Hodges was the managing editor of The United Methodist Reporter from 2011-2013. A formee reporter for the Dallas Morning News and the Charlotte Observer, Sam is a respected voice in United Methodist journalism.

Facebook LinkedIn 

Join the conversation....

  1. Perhaps you could put the names in a glass chalice and have a blindfolded boy or girl pick the assignments. I think this falls outside ¶ 163G but we would probably find out on appeal.

  2. pastordmbrown says:

    May God bless all of us that are called United Methodist as we face so many challenges day in and day out. We unfortunately have spent so much time, energy and dollars trying to figure out "what's next?" God has ordered our steps collectiely and indivually and we must put him first in all of our decisions so we want be going down so many rabbit trails. The local churches are under constant attack because some where down the line we are no longer carrying out the mission of the church and that is being "United." United with each other as one in our local communities and throughout the world through the blood and spirit of Jesus Christ.

    Let us all pray as one and through the power of the Holy Spirit I am convinced the right solution will be given, no more rabbit holes.

Your thoughts?

applications-education-miscellaneous.png
The United Methodist Reporter wants to encourage lively conversation about The United Methodist Church and our articles in the belief that Christian conversation (what Wesley would call conferencing) is a means of grace. While we support passionate debate, we cannot allow language that demeans or demonizes others, and we reserve the right to delete any comment we believe to be harmful or inappropriate. We encourage all to remember that we are all broken and in need of Christ's grace, and that we all see through the glass darkly until that time we when reach full perfection in love. May your speech here be tempered with love, and reflection of the fruits of love, joy, peace, patience, kindness, goodness, faithfulness, gentleness, and self-control. After all, "There is no law against things like this." (Galatians 5:22-23)
 

*

Google+
%d bloggers like this: