Film Review: ‘Lincoln’ depicts politics in all its unsavory glory

By Rebecca Cusey, Special Contributor…

Lincoln
Rated PG-13 for an intense scene of war violence, some images of carnage
and brief strong language

 

We have all heard the saying about politics: “Laws are like sausages. It’s better to not see them being made.”

However, in Steven Spielberg’s fantastic biopic of President Abraham Lincoln, not only does Daniel Day-Lewis present a winning portrait of a great man, but Mr. Spielberg finds beauty in the very muck of the sausage being made.

This is democracy, and it is messy and beautiful.

As we lick our wounds from a contentious election and gird our loins for the legislative battles to come, this movie reminds us of the bold and desperate experiment of American democracy, a system that stinks but is better than anything else the world has to offer.

In a scene from director Steven Spielberg’s new film, President Abraham Lincoln (Daniel Day-Lewis) confers with Secretary of State William Seward (David Strathairn). PHOTOS COURTESY DREAMWORKS PICTURES AND 20TH CENTURY FOX

The film covers just a segment of Lincoln’s life. In 1865, the war rages on and Lincoln’s desperate battle to save the Union is still in doubt. The Battle of Gettysburg, and the inspirational speech given there, is a raw memory. Lincoln has won and begun a second term as President. His Emancipation Proclamation, a wartime edict freeing slaves, has been in effect for two years.

So many have died, yet the war bleeds the country dry and the people are weary.

In this context, Lincoln embarks on a quest to amend the United States Constitution to permanently outlaw slavery.

The proposed Thirteenth Amendment has mixed support: Conservatives want an end to the fighting above all else. Some radicals want full enfranchisement of former slaves and will accept no partial solutions. Most want the war to end and see the Amendment as a distasteful and frightening, but necessary step to break the Confederacy, much like dropping the Atomic Bomb on Hiroshima.

Lincoln’s Republican Party is divided into factions that will bargain and horse-trade in order to win their support. Not only that, but he is short on the votes needed to pass a Constitutional amendment and must convince Democrats, by hook or by crook, to change their votes.

Lincoln remains clear on his eventual goal as well as the great swamps of resistance and danger between himself and the goal. He sets out to use every legal and semi-legal method to reach the goal he knows is just. He is willing to compromise. He is willing to cajole others to compromise their dearly held positions, based on their firm moral beliefs. He boldly asks them to lie. He does not shy away from unsavory tactics, buying votes with political appointments, withholding information from some parties and using the same information to prod others.

Sally Field co-stars as Mary Todd Lincoln, the president’s wife from 1842 until his assassination in 1865.

In this way, he tenderly and carefully builds a coalition that may, possibly, pass the amendment making his dubiously legal Emancipation Proclamation the constitutionally-inscribed law of the land.

It sounds boring, but it’s not.

The screenplay is by Tony Kushner, who also co-wrote Mr. Spielberg’s Munich, with consultation by Harvard historian Doris Kearns Goodwin. Dr. Goodwin wrote Team of Rivals: The Political Genius of Abraham Lincoln, on which the movie is based. There is plenty of humor, plenty of gee-whiz historical contrasts, such as when aides literally sprint from the Capitol to the White House to consult with Lincoln, arriving sweaty and out of breath in those days long before email and Twitter.

Secondary historical figures are well-rounded and expertly drawn: nervous Secretary of State William Seward (David Strathairn), earthy political operative W.N. Bilbo (James Spader), firey abolitionist Thaddeus Stevens (Tommy Lee Jones). Sally Field gives a wrenching turn as the troubled Mrs. Lincoln, whose mental health was sacrificed for the Union as much as the soldiers on the field. In addition, Lincoln tries to manage the needs of his grown son Robert (Joseph Gordon-Levitt) and child son Tad (Gulliver McGrath), as the family mourns the loss of brother Willie.

Life is never just one thing: profound, heavy, fun, or silly. Mr. Day-Lewis gives a fantastic performance of a great man trying to keep all sides of his life going. He speaks gently and truly to soldiers on the eve of battle. He wrestles with his little Tad. He calms Seward and speaks hard truth to Stevens. He manages a thousand threads, then goes home to talk sanity into his distraught wife. It works, but barely. One cannot imagine how he keeps going.

In the midst of this, however, Mr. Day-Lewis portrays him as a man you would want to be around. He tells funny stories to calm tense nerves as they wait for news of battle. He asks lowly telegraph clerks their thoughts on the meaning of life, then shares with them his reverence for a line from Euclid.

He is firm where he needs to be, kind when he can be, and fully human.

It’s a remarkable performance of a remarkable man.

Rated PG-13, the film begins with a disturbing battle scene, showing the muck, desperation and savagery of this war between brothers. The film does not focus on the war, but it is always in the background. Other shots include Lincoln touring a battlefield strewn with the dead. These scenes are pure Spielberg and will be disturbing to younger children. Parents should use caution about whether their children are prepared to handle them. Other than that, there is no sexuality at all and only brief language.

The greatest blessing of this film for us, only a few weeks after the election, is perspective. Our election was contentious, yes, but not a single person died as a result of it. American Democracy works, not well, but better than armed conflict or totalitarianism.

The second message is for the electorate not to be afraid of the sausage being made. As we battle over health-care reform, Social Security, different methods of stimulating the economy, freedom of speech and freedom of religion, we should realize that strong men and women with strong opinions will disagree. They will disagree and use every tactic to win. They will obstruct. They will threaten and spin and withhold truth. They will destroy character, slander, imply.

It matters. Our country matters. And we would expect no less from our representatives than to try their best within the confines of the law.

We need more Lincolns, with clear vision and determination to right wrongs.

This is the sausage. And it is good.

Ms. Cusey is a freelance writer in the Washington, D.C., area. This review first appeared on Patheos.com.

Special Contributor

This story was written by a special contributor to The United Methodist Reporter. You may send your article submissions to
editor@circuitwritermedia.com
.

Sorry, but there are no comments yet.

Your thoughts?

applications-education-miscellaneous.png
The United Methodist Reporter wants to encourage lively conversation about The United Methodist Church and our articles in the belief that Christian conversation (what Wesley would call conferencing) is a means of grace. While we support passionate debate, we cannot allow language that demeans or demonizes others, and we reserve the right to delete any comment we believe to be harmful or inappropriate. We encourage all to remember that we are all broken and in need of Christ's grace, and that we all see through the glass darkly until that time we when reach full perfection in love. May your speech here be tempered with love, and reflection of the fruits of love, joy, peace, patience, kindness, goodness, faithfulness, gentleness, and self-control. After all, "There is no law against things like this." (Galatians 5:22-23)
 

*

Google+
%d bloggers like this: