Commentary: Jackie Robinson’s faith missing from ‘42’ movie

By Eric Metaxas, Religion News Service…

A new film about Jackie Robinson, titled 42—the number he wore during his historic career—tells the triumphant story of how the civil rights icon integrated professional baseball by playing for the Brooklyn Dodgers. But there’s a mysterious hole at the center of this otherwise worthy film.

Eric Metaxas

The man who chose Robinson for his role, and masterminded the whole affair, was Dodgers General Manager Branch Rickey, played by Harrison Ford. In their initial meeting, the cigar-chomping Rickey makes it clear that whoever will be the first African American in major league baseball will be viciously attacked, verbally and physically. So Rickey famously says he’s looking for a man “with guts enough not to fight back.” He needs someone who will resist the temptation to retaliate. Robinson agrees to go along with it.

But where did Rickey get that crazy idea and why did Robinson agree? The film doesn’t tell us, but the answers to these questions lie in the devout Christian faith of both men.

For starters, Rickey himself was a “Bible-thumping Methodist” who refused to attend games on Sunday. He sincerely believed it was God’s will that he integrate baseball and saw it as an opportunity to intervene in the moral history of the nation, as Lincoln had done.

And Rickey chose Robinson because of the young man’s faith and moral character. There were numerous other Negro Leagues players to consider, but Rickey knew integrating the racist world of professional sports would take more than athletic ability. The attacks would be ugly, and the press would fuel the fire. If the player chosen were goaded into retaliating, the grand experiment would be set back a decade or more.

Rickey knew he must find someone whose behavior on and off the field would be exemplary, and who believed “turning the other cheek” was not just the practical thing to do but the right thing. In their historic meeting, to underscore the spiritual dimension of the undertaking, Rickey pulled out a book by Giovanni Papini, titled Life of Christ. He opened to the passage about the Sermon on the Mount and read it aloud.

We know that Robinson’s passionate sense of justice had gotten him into trouble earlier in life. But the patient mentoring of pastor Karl Downs convinced him that Christ’s command to “resist not evil” wasn’t a cowardly way out but a profoundly heroic stance.

When he met Rickey, Robinson was prepared for what lay ahead and agreed. But it was a brutally difficult undertaking. Robinson got down on his knees many nights during those first two years, asking God for the strength to continue resisting the temptation to fight back, or to say something he would regret.

But the filmmakers of 42 were evidently uncomfortable with all this and simply avoided it. To put it in baseball terms, they decided to pitch around it.

Of course, Hollywood has been skittish about faith and religion since at least the late 1960s. Even when it’s almost impossible to avoid, filmmakers find a way. The Johnny Cash biopic Walk the Line omitted the central role Christian faith played in how Cash overcame drug addiction. Even in 2007’s Amazing Grace, about British abolitionist William Wilberforce, the story of his conversion and the huge role faith played in his political efforts is essentially left out.

And now in 42, Hollywood’s done it again, check-swinging a bloop single past the infield when a fence-clearing clout—or at least extra bases—was easily possible.

Omitting the role of faith in this story does a serious disservice to history—and to the memories of Robinson and Rickey. But it’s also financially foolish. The recent mega-success of The Bible miniseries and the cool $600 million earned by Mel Gibson’s The Passion of the Christ in 2004 are just two reasons why. The audience for faith-friendly films is huge and growing.

Which brings us back to another reason Rickey did what he did. He believed bringing African Americans onto the baseball field would bring them into the stands, too, and ticket sales would increase. Which is precisely what happened.

So isn’t it time Hollywood integrated faith into stories where it rightfully belongs? Why should such stories be excluded from the mainstream in a nation that’s filled with people of faith? If filmmakers do the right thing—and break the “God line”—they’ll find there are countless millions who’d cheer stories like that. And who’d pay to see them too.

Mr. Metaxas is the author of Bonhoeffer: Pastor, Martyr, Prophet, Spy. He writes about Jackie Robinson in his new book Seven Men and the Secret of their Greatness. This column appeared first in USA Today.

 

Special Contributor to UMR

Special Contributor

This story was written by a special contributor to The United Methodist Reporter. You may send your article submissions to
editor@circuitwritermedia.com
.

Leave a Reply

5 Comments on "Commentary: Jackie Robinson’s faith missing from ‘42’ movie"

applications-education-miscellaneous.png
The United Methodist Reporter wants to encourage lively conversation about The United Methodist Church and our articles in the belief that Christian conversation (what Wesley would call conferencing) is a means of grace. While we support passionate debate, we cannot allow language that demeans or demonizes others, and we reserve the right to delete any comment we believe to be harmful or inappropriate. We encourage all to remember that we are all broken and in need of Christ's grace, and that we all see through the glass darkly until that time we when reach full perfection in love. May your speech here be tempered with love, and reflection of the fruits of love, joy, peace, patience, kindness, goodness, faithfulness, gentleness, and self-control. After all, "There is no law against things like this." (Galatians 5:22-23)
 
Notify of
avatar
Sort by:   newest | oldest | most voted
jaltman81
Guest

Does Mr. Metaxas not know the difference between a movie and a book? The religious motivations of Branch Rickey are clearly addressed and depicted in the movie, as is the courage of Robinson.

cneitzey
Guest
Mr. Metaxas said, "So isn’t it time Hollywood integrated faith into stories where it rightfully belongs? Why should such stories be excluded from the mainstream in a nation that’s filled with people of faith? If filmmakers do the right thing—and break the “God line”—they’ll find there are countless millions who’d cheer stories like that. And who’d pay to see them too." They did Mr. Metaxas, and the incorrect stance of your review of 42 is undermining this effort. I have seen 42 twice, and I am astounded at how off Mr. Metaxas is in this article. 42 is not only… Read more »
peterdeg
Guest

I too wonder about which movie the reviewer saw. It's a movie, not a sermon.

theauldwan
Guest

Home Run! This time by Eric….

smanskar
Guest
It seems Mr. Metaxas and I saw a different movie with the same title, "42." The movie I saw made very clear that Branch Ricky's primary motivation for his determination to integrate major league baseball was his Christian faith steeped in the Methodist tradition. One of my favorite scenes occurs early in the film when he Ricky is trying to explain to his staff why he is determined to act to bring Jackie Robinson to the Brooklyn Dodgers in spite of the trouble such an action will bring to the organization and to both men personally. Ricky, in exasperation, exclaims:… Read more »
wpDiscuz
Google+
%d bloggers like this: