IRD sponsors petition affirming “biblical marriage”

Affirm UMC MarriageThe UMAction division of The Institute on Religion and Democracy(IRD) has created a web petition for United Methodists asking them to affirm that marriage is reserved for one man and one woman, that sex is reserved with the covenant of a monogamous, heterosexual marriage, and prohibiting clergy and churches from celebrating same-sex rites. The site, located at methodistsaffirmingmarriage.com, asks United Methodists who want to retain the current language of the United Methodist Book of Discipline to make their position known through signing on to the petition.

“A lot of members of our denomination’s growing orthodox majority are feeling upset over the actions and all the disproportionate attention given to those undermining the UMC,” said John Lomperis, the United Methodist director at IRD .  “Our petition gives people a simple, constructive way to stand together for biblical faithfulness, seeking God’s best for ALL people, and keeping our word to God and each other in our church.”

Recent events, including the trial of the Rev. Frank Schaefer and the presiding at a same-sex wedding by Bishop Melvin Talbert and the subsequent request by the Council of Bishops that he face discipline for his actions have pushed the United Methodist debate on the inclusion of GLBTQ persons in the life of the church, as well as the church’s role in affirming same-sex marriage, into the headlines. The IRD sponsored site suggests that this represents an attempt by liberal clergy and churches to circumvent the normal legislative process of the General Conference, which creates church law every four years.

The Institute on Religion and Democracy is an independent conservative think tank located in Washington D.C.

UMReporter Staff

This story was posted by a staff member of The United Methodist Reporter. For over 160 years The United Methodist Reporter has been helping the people called Methodist to tell their stories. If you have stories that you think need to be told, please let us know at editor@circuitwritermedia.com

Facebook Twitter 

Leave a Reply

14 Comments on "IRD sponsors petition affirming “biblical marriage”"

applications-education-miscellaneous.png
The United Methodist Reporter wants to encourage lively conversation about The United Methodist Church and our articles in the belief that Christian conversation (what Wesley would call conferencing) is a means of grace. While we support passionate debate, we cannot allow language that demeans or demonizes others, and we reserve the right to delete any comment we believe to be harmful or inappropriate. We encourage all to remember that we are all broken and in need of Christ's grace, and that we all see through the glass darkly until that time we when reach full perfection in love. May your speech here be tempered with love, and reflection of the fruits of love, joy, peace, patience, kindness, goodness, faithfulness, gentleness, and self-control. After all, "There is no law against things like this." (Galatians 5:22-23)
 
Notify of
avatar
Sort by:   newest | oldest | most voted
james
Guest

Way to go WAD!! Are you a umc pastor?

thewaggonerfamily
Guest

I read this, and honestly thought it was a post from The Onion. Biblical marriage? Are you serious? Which part are you upholding? Where I have to marry my rapist? Or where my husband can have other wives and concubines? Or, or…. I'm tiired of the radicals at both ends. Here's a crazy thought…how about we take all the time, money, energy and resources we are spending fighting about this, and use it to make disciples for Jesus Christ.

John JP Patterson
Guest

Hmmm… Since one side refuses to compromise and the other side refuses to accept second class status… I wonder, how will the United Methodist Church be divided when, not if, it officially splits. In 1844 the church was divided, north and south, free and slave. Will it be red state and blue state… rural and urban… or north and south, again?

Jay
Guest

I think they should also propose adding a clause to the Board of Discipline saying that UMC ministers cannot preside at the wedding of any person who has had pre-marital or extra-marital sex or is guilty of masturbation, fornication, or adultery. Alas, that would mean that UMC ministers could marry no one. Of course, these people are not really interested in biblical faithfulness or "sexual purity," they are simply interested in oppressing homosexuals.

james
Guest

Much of the heirarchy espouses the notion that scripture is progressive and that the umc is progressive. I support the IRD and believe it is good to have a conservative entity that is not afraid to report what is going on in today's "christian" church. A pastor in the little church I attend (who has since been transfered) told me that the only thing that keeps the umc on trac is the Methodist Church in Africa. Thank you African Bishops for plowing a straight row………………

Doug Hyndrich
Guest

As a United Methodist pastor, I support marriage between one man and one woman. Those who stand opposed to same sex marriage also have the right to be heard.

Rev. Robert Fulton
Guest

Hmm. I know biblical Hebrew and koine Greek. They are standing on the right side.

Favorite Son
Guest

I support the petition.

Susan Barron
Guest

United Methodist Action?? Sorry, IRD, I won't support hate.

Maureen Jones
Guest
I can not in good conscience support this petition. I am sad to see this division becoming more and more bitter and the fundamentalist view of homosexuality to be rooted in such fear and revulsion. I pray that God will change the hearts of the persecutors and open their eyes to the fact that every soul on earth is worthy of loving and of being loved. A marriage between two people whatever their sexual identity is a covenant no less deserving of affirmation and support than of any other. To expect a father to choose between his child and his… Read more »
wpDiscuz
Google+
%d bloggers like this: