Denominational restructuring won’t work; local churches must innovate

RNS-TOM-EHRICH-369x369

(RNS) After 50 years of decline, mainline denominations are reinventing themselves, or at least “re-imagining” what the church might look like, as an Episcopal Church task force calls it.

What can the “central office” do to stem the ebbing tide? What can national conventions and agencies do?

The answer is: precious little.

In an earnest 3,000-word letter to the church, the Episcopal task force acknowledged that “innovation and adaptation” are already under way at local levels, where the church’s fortunes actually are shaped. “With or without” action by churchwide bodies, the new is breaking in.

The report is well-written, cogently argued, filled with fresh language and insights formed in wide-open discussion. This isn’t an old guard restating its longtime purpose.

But the task force clearly has limited its focus to what changes are necessary at the national church level. To me, that seems a bit like redecorating and recalibrating the home office of a company in which the home office plays a minor role.

Mainline denominations are down more than 42 percent from their peak in 1965, and two-thirds below the level they could have been if they had simply kept growing with the population.

The visioning that needs to happen will be at the local level, where congregations are still too inward-focused and tend to fuss about internal concerns because they are easier to address.

The home office can exert some leverage in local visioning, but that will require more than actions to clarify how decisions are made at the churchwide level.

Rather than “rearrange the deck chairs,” the task force could look boldly at what isn’t working: Sunday worship, large facilities and an inward focus.

From what I read, other denominations face the same dilemma: National offices and agencies have little to do with church health. The future won’t be secured with national rules and procedures, convention resolutions, different approaches to ordination, or modernizing decision-making and communications at a home office in New York, Louisville or Cleveland.

The Episcopal report talks about changing “the church’s operating paradigm” to a “network-based model,” as opposed to a top-down directive model. All well and good, but not nearly enough. Local congregations are still doing mission and ministry in ways that don’t work but are difficult to change.

Sunday worship, for example, hasn’t been a growth engine for decades and now isn’t even a survival strategy. Even though it’s the thing most mainline congregations do best, Sunday worship fails to reach younger populations and fails to retain the interest of older populations. Audience-style religion fails to transform lives.

Facilities, for another example, aren’t just expensive. The building designed for weekly worship fails to engage anyone outside the shrinking band of Sunday worshippers. Even the idea of a central location for community life misfires in an age of fragmentation. People connect with peers in smaller settings or self-determining networks. Facilities built for en-masse-style gatherings are no longer relevant.

Congregations that could be facing outward and grappling with the mounting woes of a society in free fall do the opposite: They face inward, with occasional sorties into mission. They pick symbolic battles, but don’t convincingly send members out to make the world better.

Changing these three paradigms (Sunday worship, large facilities, inward focus) would be enormous work for a historic church. The national church might have a useful role to play in that change. But rearranging offices in a Manhattan office tower won’t do.

(Tom Ehrich is a writer, church consultant and Episcopal priest based in New York. He is the president of Morning Walk Media and publisher of Fresh Day online magazine. His website is www.morningwalkmedia.com. Follow Tom on Twitter @tomehrich.)

Religion News Service

RNS is owned by Religion News LLC, a non-profit, limited liability corporation based at the University of Missouri School of Journalism. Its mission is to provide in-depth, non-sectarian coverage of religion, spirituality and ideas.

Leave a Reply

3 Comments on "Denominational restructuring won’t work; local churches must innovate"

applications-education-miscellaneous.png
The United Methodist Reporter wants to encourage lively conversation about The United Methodist Church and our articles in the belief that Christian conversation (what Wesley would call conferencing) is a means of grace. While we support passionate debate, we cannot allow language that demeans or demonizes others, and we reserve the right to delete any comment we believe to be harmful or inappropriate. We encourage all to remember that we are all broken and in need of Christ's grace, and that we all see through the glass darkly until that time we when reach full perfection in love. May your speech here be tempered with love, and reflection of the fruits of love, joy, peace, patience, kindness, goodness, faithfulness, gentleness, and self-control. After all, "There is no law against things like this." (Galatians 5:22-23)
 
Notify of
avatar
Sort by:   newest | oldest | most voted
Diane Adele Rheos
Guest
I agree with you Tom and I am so happy that you brought attention to this issue. We are in a time of great transformation, both in communities of faith as well as business and government. Most of our old ways of doing things- top down or hierarchically, no longer works. I too believe that we need to use a “network-based model” at the “local level”- it is exactly what is going to work. As the old top-down structures are failing, the only possible answer is for people locally to come together and co-create groups or organizations organized locally. That… Read more »
james
Guest

Morning Russ: Please check out the website below and seek out a devotion titled “Take the Cross.” Perhaps–just perhaps–this may be the answer to the shrinking umc.

jim@jimbrunnerministries.org

Sam
Guest
If I read this correctly, the author seems to be hinting at the multi-use facility rather than a church sanctuary and changing the day of religious services. So basically, is the argument that churches need to become more auditorium style, with removable chairs, removable “stage,” portable sound/music system, and hold services on Saturday night– in other words become like some of the seemingly more successful non-denominational churches that preach an easy, feel good gospel and essentially provide religious entertainment? While you’ll get some people that way, you’ll lose others. What the mainline church needs to be focusing on instead of… Read more »
wpDiscuz
Google+
%d bloggers like this: