Photo by Andy Roberts
by B. Kevin Smalls Visit his blog at bkevinsmalls.wordpress.com.
I remember growing up hearing the complaints of how costly apportionments are to some local churches. “We don’t have that many people.” “Our building is falling down around us.” “We have needs in our own backyard.”
Sadly, I’ve also seen the passive-aggressive ways of congregations to punish the connectional church for being situated outside of the bounds of their theological compass. Some congregations get mad at the annual conferences or bishops for sending them pastor’s that don’t meet their approval and the response has in some cases been, “we will not pay apportionments.”
The problem with this is that there are people in the middle of these fights, who suffer. While we are using our resources to send our denomination a message, we aren’t showing up to do our part in the line of our missional commitment and responsibility. We are leaving people stranded in life’s lowest places.
Read More: http://bwcumc.org/the-inconvenience-of-apportionments/
Leave a Reply
6 Comments on "Recently Read: The inconvenience of apportionments"
It seems to me demands for “accountability” by the right-wing within the UMC amount entirely to the unwillingness of the demander to ascertain that he cannot have his way. Our right-wing caucus is engaged in action toward their own power and control over others and nothing else. Sneering slogans like describing themselves as “those who trust in the scripture” are meaningless phrases crafted to fool the gullible.
George,
Many of us hated our tithes going to the GBCS, which would use them to promote a political agenda we vehemently disagreed with. I would imagine you’d be as equally angry if they went to promoting things you disagreed with. Imagine if your tithes went to promote a pro-gun, anti-abortion, anti-gay marriage , pro-military etc agenda. That is why many conservatives do not like apportionments.
I would answer your hypothetical question with a “Say What?” in my best Marlon Wayans imitation voice. I’m quite pro-gun myself, thank you, as well as pro-military, although opposed to the NRA’s opportunist agenda and militarism. As to the other, sure. But why would one join a church which favors justice if one is in favor of injustice? Our stance on women’s rights and dignity of all despite some archaic and unsound details is over 50 years old; if one wants one’s church body to bash women and LGBTs, why bother becoming UMC?