GC2016 Executive Committee changes Rule 44 recommendation

rule44-01

Nashville, TN – The Executive Committee of the Commission on the General Conference has narrowed the list of petitions that they are recommending be handled through an alternative discernment process – dubbed Rule 44 – from 101 to 56.

Rule 44 is designed to provide a safe space in which all delegates can contribute to the discussion, find new ways of participating in dialogue so that it becomes clearer what issues need to be addressed, foster a renewed sense of community and embody a credible Christian witness on how people can work together even in conflict. The recommendation for a new process came after the 2012 General Conference requested a more constructive and respectful way to discuss difficult decisions.

The General Conference will have an opportunity to vote on whether to use the process and, if approved, what business will be subject to the rule.

The Commission had previously recommended that delegates utilize the process, which is based on a practice that originated in the Uniting Church in Australia, for all legislative petitions regarding human sexuality.

“The Commission wanted a plan with a proven track record. The Uniting Church in Australia has been able to address contentious issues in a respectful way using this process, and garnered high levels of agreement,” said the Rev. Gere Reist, secretary of the General Conference. “Other organizations like the World Council of Churches and the World Communion of Reformed Churches have successfully used it also.”

Reist said the petitions secretary originally identified 101 petitions related to human sexuality, but committee members decided it was not feasible to handle that volume of petitions in the allotted time.

Reist worked with the Rev. Terence Corkin, former General Secretary of the National Assembly of the Uniting Church in Australia, to identify those that were most directly related to human sexuality issues. The list will be published in the first Daily Christian Advocate.

Corkin, a consultant and trained church mediator, was responsible for leading a similar process at six meetings of their National Assembly and will be involved in introducing the process in the plenary session.

“What we found very, very quickly was that people felt empowered to participate and they started to collaborate … the purpose is to work together, to work out what God wants at this time and this place in this community,” said the Rev. Corkin. He said the culture of his church has changed enormously in the last 12-15 years that they have been using this process.

He says the process, which calls for discussion in small groups before plenary voting led by delegates nominated by the annual conferences, allows more voices to be heard.

“What I’ve found in working with churches and international groups is that people actually appreciate being asked to talk together face-to-face about the things that matter to them …” explained Corkin. “The intention of the rule is to give us the best chance to see what most people think before we then have to come to a vote on it.”

The ideas and views that arise in these small group discussions will be incorporated into a report written by an elected six-member facilitation group, which moves into the next stage of the discussion for decision by the whole General Conference.

“It’s a way of being in community. It can help a community of faith work together to build a sense of the community’s mind …” said Corkin. “It doesn’t happen in a snap, you’ve got to work it up from the fellowship you create. It’s a way of being together, and I am certain that it doesn’t matter what the issue is, this process allows for those things to happen.”

Leave a Reply

5 Comments on "GC2016 Executive Committee changes Rule 44 recommendation"

applications-education-miscellaneous.png
The United Methodist Reporter wants to encourage lively conversation about The United Methodist Church and our articles in the belief that Christian conversation (what Wesley would call conferencing) is a means of grace. While we support passionate debate, we cannot allow language that demeans or demonizes others, and we reserve the right to delete any comment we believe to be harmful or inappropriate. We encourage all to remember that we are all broken and in need of Christ's grace, and that we all see through the glass darkly until that time we when reach full perfection in love. May your speech here be tempered with love, and reflection of the fruits of love, joy, peace, patience, kindness, goodness, faithfulness, gentleness, and self-control. After all, "There is no law against things like this." (Galatians 5:22-23)
 
Notify of
avatar
Sort by:   newest | oldest | most voted
Jerry G.Putnam
Guest

Has this process been voted on by GC?!

David
Guest

Jerry,
I believe it has not been voted upon yet. Looking at the GC schedule I think (but could be wrong) that the time of the vote will be tonight 5/10 at 4:45.
My Question is: if Rule 44 is voted down (which I am hoping for) … are those on the standing committee prepared for it to go back to Roberts Rule of order? Or will there be backpedaling on the schedule? Simply Put are those in authority going into it already assuming it will be passed?

David
Guest

Note 4:45 Portland Oregon, Time.

David
Guest
Jerry, It has to be voted on by the General conference to be approved I believe the vote has not yet taken place. Looking at the General conference schedule, I think that vote will be today (5-10) at 4:45 Portland, Oregon Time. (I could be wrong about the timing … but that is my best understanding of it. Looking at when the Standing Rues are voted upon) My Question is: if it doesn’t pass (which I hope it does not)… does the rules committee have a plan to go back to the normal Roberts rules of order. Or are they… Read more »
Charles Harrison
Admin

Not yet Jerry.

wpDiscuz
Google+
%d bloggers like this: