IRD issues statement on election of openly gay bishop

IRDWashington, DC — The Institute for Religion and Democracy have released a statement this week offering their thoughts on the recent election and consecration of Karen Oliveto (the pastor of Glide Memorial United Methodist Church in San Francisco) to be a bishop of The United Methodist Church.

“The Western Jurisdiction has a history of prominent disobedience to church rules, resulting in long-term diminishment and decline, despite population growth in its surrounding communities,”Said John Lomperis, the director of the IRD’s UMAction.  “This is a fundamentally schismatic action of the Western Jurisdiction declaring it no longer wants to live in unity with the rest of our denomination. Now some United Methodists in the rest of the country will likely want to stop paying the denominational apportionments which heavily subsidize the six-figure salaries of Oliveto and other bishops in the Western Jurisdiction – the only U.S. Jurisdiction rewarded with more bishops than they pay for themselves.”

The Institute for Religion and Democracy describes itself as “an ecumenical alliance of U.S. Christians working to reform their churches’ social witness, in accord with biblical and historic Christian teachings, thereby contributing to the renewal of democratic society at home and abroad.” Founded in 1981, the IRD has traditionally opposed changes in The United Methodist’s Church’s teachings on human sexuality.

“We urge faithful United Methodists upset by this news to stay and work for accountability, share their concerns with their pastors and remember that such radical actions only represent a minority, who we should not let abuse and take-over our great denomination,” Lomperis said. He also called on “orthodox bishops” to offer public leadership in seeking accountability.

“Oliveto chose to seek ordination in our denomination and vowed to uphold our standards. If she is no longer Methodist in belief, she would have more integrity to find another faith community, rather than breaking the promises she chose to make to us.”

UMReporter Staff

This story was posted by a staff member of The United Methodist Reporter. For over 160 years The United Methodist Reporter has been helping the people called Methodist to tell their stories. If you have stories that you think need to be told, please let us know at editor@circuitwritermedia.com

Facebook Twitter 

Leave a Reply

3 Comments on "IRD issues statement on election of openly gay bishop"

applications-education-miscellaneous.png
The United Methodist Reporter wants to encourage lively conversation about The United Methodist Church and our articles in the belief that Christian conversation (what Wesley would call conferencing) is a means of grace. While we support passionate debate, we cannot allow language that demeans or demonizes others, and we reserve the right to delete any comment we believe to be harmful or inappropriate. We encourage all to remember that we are all broken and in need of Christ's grace, and that we all see through the glass darkly until that time we when reach full perfection in love. May your speech here be tempered with love, and reflection of the fruits of love, joy, peace, patience, kindness, goodness, faithfulness, gentleness, and self-control. After all, "There is no law against things like this." (Galatians 5:22-23)
 
avatar
  Subscribe  
newest oldest most voted
Notify of
Jack Harnish
Guest

Why does the opinion of the IRD even matter? They are not affiliated with the UMC and they literally have “no skin in the game”.

David
Guest

I believe the same could be said of ‘ reconciling ministry network’ but we often here from them on this site and umc.organization news.

Paul W.
Guest
The IRD does have “skin in the game”. Mark Tooley and John Lomperis are both United Methodists. Their UMAction group is focused exclusively on issues within the UMC. They are a key part of the Renewal and Reform Coalition for the UMC. Much of the theologically liberal wackiness that goes on in our agencies and seminaries has been exposed by the IRD, which, I’m convinced, is why the progressive UMC bureaucrats show such disdain for the IRD. Shining a light on those areas the progressives would rather keep hidden from those of us in the pews is essential work since… Read more »
Google+
%d bloggers like this: